湖北大老岭国家级自然保护区中华鬣羚和中华斑羚冬季食性比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.三峡大学生物与制药学院 宜昌 443002;2.湖北沐芳农林生态科技有限公司 宜昌 443000;3.湖北省三峡地区生态保护与治理国际联合研究中心 宜昌 443002

作者简介:

沈红洋,男,硕士研究生;研究方向:动物生态学;E-mail:19086829319@163.com。
雷东方,男,学士;研究方向:森林生态学;E-mail:892249263@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 31570543);


Comparison on winter diets of Chinese Serow (Capricornis milneedwardsii) and Chinese Goral (Naemorhedus griseus) in Hubei Dalaoling National Nature Reserve, China
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002;2.Hubei Mufang Agriculture, Forestry and Ecological Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang 443000; 3.International Joint Research Center for Ecological Protection and Governance in the Three Gorges Area of Hubei Province, Yichang 443002, China

Fund Project:

undefined

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    食性研究是濒危动物保护的重要内容。中华鬣羚(Capricornis milneedwardsii)和中华斑羚(Naemorhedus griseus)均为我国二级重点保护野生动物,为了研究两种动物生存瓶颈期(越冬期)的食性,本研究于2023年11月至2024年3月,在湖北大老岭国家级自然保护区内,运用红外相机技术、样线调查、野外样方法与粪便显微分析技术,对同域分布的中华鬣羚和中华斑羚开展了越冬期粪便食物组成研究。之后通过国家标准方法对食源植物中相应营养成分(粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗纤维、粗灰分)含量进行测定,通过营养成分含量和采食频率的相关性分析对两种有蹄类动物冬季营养适应机制进行研究。结果如下:(1)共发现中华鬣羚粪便83处,中华斑羚粪便47处,收集到两个物种的复合粪便样本各20份。(2)中华鬣羚和中华斑羚冬季均取食12科13种植物,两者取食植物12种存在重叠,中华鬣羚冬季主要食源植物为莎草科(Cyperaceae)、胡颓子科(Elaeagnaceae)、鳞毛蕨科(Dryopteridaceae)和黄杨科(Buxaceae)植物;中华斑羚冬季主要食源植物为莎草科、五福花科(Adoxaceae)、龙胆科(Gentianaceae)和黄杨科植物。(3)中华鬣羚和中华斑羚冬季食物多样性十分接近,Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H)分别为2.23和2.25,Pielou均匀度指数(J)分别为0.86和0.87,生态位宽度指数(B)分别为8.30和8.42,且二者食物生态位重叠指数(C)为0.88,重叠较大。(4)中华鬣羚冬季取食频率与食源植物中粗蛋白(R = 0.42,P < 0.05)、粗脂肪(R = 0.35,P < 0.05)及粗纤维含量(R = 0.33,P < 0.05)具有显著正相关,与粗灰分和单宁含量的相关性无统计学意义(P > 0.05);中华斑羚冬季取食频率与食源植物中粗蛋白(R = 0.61,P < 0.05)、粗脂肪(R = 0.59,P < 0.05)和粗灰分(R = 0.45,P < 0.05)含量具有显著正相关,与食物中粗纤维和单宁含量的相关性无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结果表明,中华鬣羚和中华斑羚在冬季食物资源利用上存在较高重叠。在取食策略上,两种动物在冬季更注重食物的可获取性而非适口性,并优先保证蛋白质和能量的稳定摄入,两者间的差异主要体现在中华鬣羚更侧重食物带来的饱腹性,中华斑羚则更侧重食物的营养精细度。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] Dietary research is a crucial component of conservation studies for endangered wildlife. Both Chinese Serow (Capricornis milneedwardsii) and Chinese Goral (Naemorhedus griseus) are class II national key protected wild animals in China. The winter season is characterized by harsh environmental conditions and scarce food resources, making the overwintering period a critical survival bottleneck for these two species. To clarify the winter dietary strategies and nutritional adaptation mechanisms of these sympatric species, this study was conducted in Hubei Dalaoling National Nature Reserve from November 2023 to March 2024. The specific research objectives are as follows:(1) To identify the winter food composition and plant category preferences of the two species; (2) To analyze the diversity of their winter diets and the degree of food niche overlap; (3) To explore the correlations of their foraging frequency with the nutrient components (crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, crude ash) and tannin of food plants; (4) To provide targeted scientific support for the conservation and management of the two species by comparing their dietary differences and adaptive strategies. [Methods] On the basis of infrared camera monitoring data collected from 2019 to 2024, 20 sites with high occurrence frequencies of Chinese Serow and 9 sites with high occurrence frequencies of Chinese Goral were selected as survey locations. At each site, a transect approximately 2 km in length was established perpendicular to the contour lines, along which signs of activity of both species were recorded and fresh fecal samples (≤ 3 d old) were collected. For each fecal occurrence area, a 20 m × 20 m plot was centered on the location to collect plant species consumed by the two ungulates. Fecal microhistological analysis (10 × 10 magnification) was conducted to determine winter diet composition, and the frequency of occurrence (F) and relative density (RD) of each plant species in feces were calculated. Diet diversity was assessed based on the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H), evenness index (J), and niche breadth index (B), while winter diet overlap between the two species was quantified by Pianka’s index (C). Nutritional components and tannin content of plants were determined strictly following national standard methods of the People’s Republic of China. Data analysis was conducted in OriginPro 2024 (Version 10.1.0.178), where one-way ANOVA was carried out to test differences in tannin content among plant species, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Pearson correlation analyses and visualization were performed in R version 4.3.2 to examine relationships between winter feeding frequency and plant nutritional components. [Results] (1) Both species fed on 13 plant species belonging to 12 families in winter. The main winter food sources of Chinese Serow were Carex taliensis (17.05%), Elaeagnus lanceolata (12.54%), Dryopteris atrata (11.35%), and Pachysandra terminalis (10.37%); while the main winter food sources of Chinese Goral were C. taliensis (18.55%), Viburnum erosum (12.35%), Tripterospermum discoideum (9.31%), and P. terminalis (9.04%) (Table 2). (2) The categories of food plants for Chinese Serow in winter were in the order of shrubs (39.35%), herbs (22.09%), ferns (17.37%), lianas (14.95%), and mosses (6.26%); for Chinese Goral, the order was herbs (34.13%), shrubs (30.88%), lianas (14.81%), ferns (13.66%), and mosses (6.52%) (Fig. 4). (3) The winter food diversity of Chinese Serow and Chinese Goral was close (Shannon-Wiener index H′:2.23 vs. 2.25; Pielou evenness index J′:0.86 vs. 0.87; Simpson index B:8.3 vs. 8.42), and their food niche overlap was high (Schoener’s niche overlap index C = 0.88), indicating that intense interspecific competition may exist between the two species (Table 3). (4) The winter foraging frequency of Chinese Serow showed positive correlations with the content of crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber in food (correlation coefficients R:0.42, 0.35, and 0.33 respectively, P < 0.05), but no significant correlation with crude ash or tannin content (P > 0.05). For Chinese Goral, its winter foraging frequency was positively correlated with crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash content in food (R:0.61, 0.59, and 0.45 respectively, P < 0.05), while no significant correlation was found with crude fiber or tannin content (P > 0.05) (Figs. 5 ~ 7). [Conclusion] The food plant species of Chinese Serow and Chinese Goral show a high overlap in winter. Regarding their foraging strategies, both species prioritize food accessibility over palatability in winter and give priority to ensuring a stable intake of protein and energy. The difference between the two species lies mainly in that Chinese Serow focuses more on the satiety provided by food, while Chinese Goral places a greater emphasis on the nutritional refinement of food.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

沈红洋,雷东方,齐一轩,林友兴,王传华. 2026.湖北大老岭国家级自然保护区中华鬣羚和中华斑羚冬季食性比较. 动物学杂志, 61(4): 507-523.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码