白头鹎鸣唱特征的晨昏比较分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国地质大学(武汉)环境学院 武汉 430078

作者简介:

刘源,男,硕士研究生;研究方向:鸟类鸣声行为生态;E-mail:939798384@qq.com。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 31000964);


Comparisons on the morning and dusk song characteristics of Light-vented Bulbuls (Pycnonotus sinensis)
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China

Fund Project:

undefined

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    鸟类的鸣唱具有保卫领域和吸引配偶的功能。很多鸟类都具有清晨和黄昏的鸣唱高峰,但大部分的鸟类鸣声研究通常只关注早晨或上午的鸣唱,而非黄昏鸣唱。因为鸟类的鸣声特征通常会受多种内、外因素的影响,一天之中晨、昏时分的环境条件变化可能导致同一物种早晨与黄昏的鸣唱声学特征、质量性状等存在差异。但这一现象目前仅在极为有限的物种中得到验证,对于大部分具有晨昏鸣唱行为的鸟类,这一点尚未可知。本研究以一种在早晨和黄昏都具有显著鸣唱行为的城市常见小型鸣禽——白头鹎(Pycnonotus sinensis)为研究对象,比较其早晨与黄昏的鸣唱特征差异。于2019年4月中旬至5月中旬,在武汉市洪山区内15个样点进行观察和录音。共测量白头鹎的早晨鸣唱302句、黄昏鸣唱268句。分析其鸣唱声学特征(包括频率参数、时间参数和能量参数)、质量性状参数及各参数的变异系数(体现鸣唱稳定程度),同时分析白头鹎鸣唱总体的类型(包括音节类型、鸣唱型和鸣唱型变异类型)丰富度、出现率以及鸣唱变异度等性状表现,按照领域进行晨、昏配对比较。结果显示,没有发现研究区内白头鹎鸣唱的上述各项特征参数存在晨昏显著差异,说明白头鹎在早晨和黄昏这两个时间段的鸣唱特征值水平、鸣唱稳定状况和总体质量性状表现都基本一致,因此认为研究区域内白头鹎的晨、昏鸣唱不存在特征差异。推测原因是同一生境内环境因子的晨昏变化幅度不足以引起白头鹎鸣唱特征上的显著变化,可能存在社会因素掩盖了这些环境因子的影响。本研究增补了白头鹎鸣声研究领域的空白,为理解鸟类鸣声的动态变化规律提供了新的参考。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] Bird songs serve the functions of territory defense and mate attraction. Many bird species exhibit high singing activity both in the early morning and at dusk. However, most studies on bird songs typically focus on morning vocalizations rather than those at dusk. Since bird song characteristics are typically influenced by a range of internal and external factors, the different environmental conditions between morning and dusk may lead to variations in songs within the same species, such as differences in acoustic parameters or qualitative characteristics. However, such differences have only been verified in a limited number of species, and whether this phenomenon exists in most bird species with bimodal singing patterns remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the songs of Light-vented Bulbuls (Pycnonotus sinensis), a common small urban songbird with prominent singing behaviors during both morning and dusk, aiming to compare the song differences between these two periods and analyze the potential underlying causes. [Methods] Recordings of Light-vented Bulbul songs were collected between mid-April and mid-May 2019. Sampling was conducted on clear days during two specific time periods:morning (6:00 ~ 9:00) and dusk (16:00 ~ 19:00). The study was carried out in Hongshan District, Wuhan, where songs were recorded from 15 different territories, each separated by at least 1 km (Fig. 1). A total of 302 songs were recorded during the morning, while 268 were recorded at dusk. For each male’s song, the following parameters were measured and calculated:1) frequency parameters:maximum frequency, minimum frequency, frequency range, and peak frequency; 2) temporal parameters:song duration and between-song interval; 3) energy parameters:aggregate entropy and average entropy; 4) qualitative characteristics:number of syllables per song and number of syllable types per song. Additionally, we examined syllable type occurrence rate, song type occurrence rate, song type variants occurrence rate, and song type variability. Spectrograms for a song type example and its song type variants are shown in Fig. 2. To examine whether there were differences in the song characteristics of Light-vented Bulbuls between morning and dusk, we calculated the mean values and coefficients of variation (CVs) for each acoustic parameter of each individual. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (repeated measures MANOVA) was conducted to compare the overall song parameters of Light-vented Bulbuls between morning and dusk. The syllable type occurrence rate, song type occurrence rate, song type variants occurrence rate, and song type variability were compared between morning and dusk by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). [Results] There were no significant overall differences in song characteristics between the two periods (repeated measures MANOVA, Pillai’s Trace, F9,6 = 1.931, P >0.05). Similarly, no significant overall differences were found in the CVs of these parameters between morning and dusk (Pillai’s Trace, F10,5 = 1.610, P >0.05). Song parameters and their CVs between morning and dusk are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Each Light-vented Bulbul produced an average of 5.0 ± 1.4 syllable types, 1.3 ± 0.5 song types, and 3.2 ± 1.4 variants per song type during morning singing. During dusk, the averages were 5.1 ± 1.1 syllable types, 1.1 ± 0.4 song types, and 3.2 ± 2.1 variants per song type. At the same recording sites, individuals used the same song types in both morning and dusk periods (Fig. 3). There were no significant differences between morning and dusk in syllable type occurrence rate (Wilcoxon signed rank test, Z14 = -0.738, P = 0.480), song type occurrence rate (Z14 = -0.057, P = 0.978), song type variants occurrence rate (Z14 = -0.966, P = 0.359), or song type variability (Z14 = -0.255, P = 0.832). [Conclusion] There are no significant differences in the aforementioned acoustic parameters of Light-vented Bulbul’s songs in the study area, suggesting that the characteristics, stability, and overall qualitative characteristics of the birds’ songs remain consistent between the morning and dusk periods. It is hypothesized that the diurnal variations in environmental factors within the same habitat is insufficient to cause significant changes in the song characteristics of Light-vented Bulbuls, and social factors may potentially mask the effects of these environmental changes. Therefore, it can be concluded that there are no significant difference between the morning and dusk songs of Light-vented Bulbuls in the study region. This study contributes to filling the gap in the research on the vocal behavior of Light-vented Bulbuls and provides new insights into the dynamic patterns of bird vocalizations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘源,孙浩轩,杨晓菁. 2026.白头鹎鸣唱特征的晨昏比较分析. 动物学杂志, 61(1): 77-90.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码