基于分子粪便学的地栖鸟类物种多样性调查方法的建立与应用
作者:
作者单位:

1 河南师范大学生命科学学院 新乡 453007;2 中国科学院动物研究所动物生态与保护生物学院重点实验室 北京 100101;3 四川小寨子沟国家级自然保护区管理处 北川 622750;4 四川省大熊猫科学研究院 成都 610000;5 西华师范大学西南野生动植物资源保护教育部重点实验室 南充 637009

作者简介:

杜飞飞,女,硕士研究生;研究方向:进化遗传学;E-mail: dufeifei@ioz.ac.cn。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2023YFF1304800),四川小寨子沟国家级自然保护区 2019 年重点生态功能区转移支付资金科学研究项目(No. 5107262020000124),中国科学院国际伙伴计划项目(No. 073GJHZ2023091GC);


Development and Application of a Survey Method for Terrestrial Bird Species Diversity Based on Molecular Scatology
Author:
Affiliation:

1 College of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007; 2 Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101; 3 Sichuan Xiaozhaizigou National Nature Reserve Administrative Bureau, Beichuan 622750; 4 Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, Chengdu 610000; 5 Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    地栖鸟类的物种多样性是衡量陆地生态系统健康状况的重要指标,对生物多样性保护策略的制定具有重要指导意义。然而,由于地栖鸟类警觉性高且栖息地复杂,传统的调查方法在野外调查中常因个体难以直接被观察而降低物种多样性评估的准确性。相比之下,基于分子粪便学的调查方法无需直接观察动物个体,仅通过粪便DNA分析即可实现准确的物种鉴定。然而,目前学界尚无严格质控的分子粪便学调查流程,限制了其相关应用。本研究以四川小寨子沟国家级自然保护区的鸡形目鸟类为对象,旨在建立一套基于分子粪便学的地栖鸟类物种多样性调查方法。研究团队于2021至2023年基于样线法开展野外调查,调查区域达保护区总面积的27.7%,调查区域植被类型以常绿针叶林和常绿阔叶林为主,海拔范围为1 438 ~ 3 810 m。调查期间共采集鸟类粪便样本116份,采用COI和Cyt b分子标记进行物种鉴定,并从样品采集到数据分析进行全过程质控和流程优化。结果表明:1)粪便的新鲜程度与物种鉴定成功率之间存在显著的正相关关系;2)使用鸟类粪便DNA进行物种鉴定的最低浓度阈值为3 mg/L;3)COI基因序列的种间遗传距离为种内遗传距离的23倍,符合“10 × 规则”(即种间遗传距离达到种内遗传距离的10倍以上可用于物种鉴定),且系统发育树显示所有物种均形成独立聚类,表明该流程能够有效区分不同的鸟类物种;4)成功提取并鉴定87份粪便样本(成功率75%),识别出10种鸟类,其中包括6种鸡形目鸟类。本研究系统分析了鸟类粪便新鲜程度与物种鉴定成功率的关系,并综合多因素优化物种鉴定流程,提高物种鉴定成功率。本研究构建的标准化分子粪便学调查方法,为自然保护地核心区的鸟类多样性监测提供了技术支持,并可用于生物多样性评估与保护管理。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] The species diversity of terrestrial birds serves as a crucial indicator for assessing terrestrial ecosystem health and holds significant implications for formulating biodiversity conservation strategies. However, due to the high vigilance of terrestrial birds and the complexity of their habitats, conventional species diversity survey methods often have low accuracy because individuals are difficult to be observed directly in field surveys. In contrast, the survey methods based on molecular scatology do not require direct sighting and allow accurate species identification through fecal DNA analysis. However, the lack of standardized and quality-controlled procedure limits its application in species diversity research. This study aims to establish a species diversity survey protocol for terrestrial birds based on molecular scatology, covering the entire process from fecal sample collection to data analysis. [Methods] This study focused on the birds of Galliformes in the Xiaozhaizigou National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province. Field surveys were conducted from 2021 to 2023 via the line transect method, covering 27.7% of the total area of the reserve. The surveyed areas were predominantly evergreen coniferous and broad-leaved forests, with elevations ranging from 1 438 to 3 810 m (Fig. 1). During the survey period, a total of 116 avian fecal samples were collected. Species were identified based on the molecular markers COI and Cyt b. The species identification protocol was optimized by integrating several key steps to enhance the success rate of species identification. These steps included selecting the freshness of samples, extracting avian DNA, and determining the minimum DNA concentration threshold required for identification. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was employed to examine the correlation between fecal sample freshness and species identification success rate. [Results] 1) The success rate of species identification in fresh and semi-fresh avian fecal samples was high (fresh: 100%; semi-fresh: 84.4%), whereas that in the old samples significantly decreased to 45.8%. The Cochran-Armitage trend test revealed a positive correlation between fecal sample freshness and species identification success rate (x2 = 21.227, df = 1, P < 0.001). 2) The minimum DNA concentration threshold for species identification using avian feces was 3 mg/L. DNA re-extraction is recommended in the case of the DNA concentration below this value. 3) The intraspecies genetic distances based on the COI gene sequence ranged from 0.001 7 for Tragopan temminckii to 0.012 7 for Lophophorus lhuysii, with a mean of 0.007 7. In contrast, the interspecies genetic distances varied from 0.125 (between Tetraophasis obscurus and Pucrasia macrolopha) to 0.250 (between Chrysolophus pictus and Tragopan temminckii), with an average of 0.177. The interspecies genetic distance was 23 times greater than the intraspecies genetic distance, meeting the “10 × rule”, which states that an interspecies genetic distance greater than 10 times the intraspecies genetic distance can be used to differentiate species (Table 2). Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis revealed that all species formed monophyletic groups, demonstrating that the established protocol can effectively distinguish bird species (Fig. 3). Ultimately, this study successfully identified 87 samples (75% success rate), encompassing 10 bird species, including 6 species of Galliformes (Table 1), and established a species diversity survey protocol based on avian molecular scatology (Fig. 4). [Conclusion] This study analyzes the relationship between the avian fecal freshness and species identification success rate, and optimizes the species identification protocol through a combination of multiple steps to improve identification success rate. The standardized survey protocol based on molecular scatology provides technical support for bird species diversity monitoring in nature reserves, and can be applied to biodiversity assessment and conservation management.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杜飞飞,王彬,孟庆玉,彭波,胥池,侯羡,杨志松,詹祥江,李莉,林蓁蓁. 2025.基于分子粪便学的地栖鸟类物种多样性调查方法的建立与应用. 动物学杂志, 60(6): 943-959.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码