卧龙保护区三种中型食肉动物的生态位差异
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川卧龙国家级自然保护区管理局 汶川 623006;2.中国科学院成都生物研究所 成都 610041;3.四川省大熊猫科学研究院 成都 610000;4.四川贡嘎山国家级自然保护区石棉管理处 石棉 625400;5.四川省林业勘查设计研究院 成都 610081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 32070520),卧龙国家级自然保护区大熊猫同域犬科动物调查和保护管理规划研究项目,四川省野生动植物资源调查保护站豺野化放归及重引入项目


Niche Differentiation among Three Middle-sized Carnivores in Wolong Nature Reserve
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Administration Bureau of Wolong National Nature Reserve;2.Chengdu Institute of Biology,Chinese Academy of Sciences;3.Sichuan?Academy?of?Giant?Panda;4.Shimian Administration Bureau of Gonggashang National Nature Reserve;5.Shchuan Academy of Forest Investigation and Designing

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2014至2019年,利用红外相机对卧龙保护区的赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)、黄喉貂(Martes flavigula)和豹猫(Prionailurus bengalensis)进行了监测,并分析比较了三者的栖息地分布和日活动节律。结果显示,赤狐栖息地主要分布于保护区西部高海拔地区,与黄喉貂和豹猫栖息地重叠较少;豹猫和黄喉貂的栖息地均集中分布于皮条河以南,且相互重叠部分达56.7%;在日活动节律方面,赤狐和豹猫表现出夜行性,黄喉貂表现出昼行性。本研究表明,三种食肉动物均通过栖息地或日活动节律的差异产生了生态位分离,从而实现了在卧龙保护区内的相互共存。

    Abstract:

    In order to study the temporal and spatial niche differentiation among middle-sized carnivores and explain their coexistence strategies in Wolong National Nature Reserve, Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), Yellow-throated Marten (Martes flavigula) and Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) were monitored from 2014 to 2019 using infrared triggered camera (Fig. 1). We modeled the habitat distribution of three species with MaxEnt and calculated the habitat overlap rate among species to indicate spatial niche differentiation. The results showed that the habitat area of Red Fox, Yellow-throated Marten and Leopard Cat was 137, 191, and 186 km2 respectively. The Red Fox inhabited in the western area of the reserve with high elevation, while the Yellow-throated Marten and Leopard Cat prefer to the south-eastern area with lower elevation (Fig. 2). The habitat overlap rate between Yellow-throated Marten and Leopard Cat was 56.7%, followed by that between Red Fox and Leopard Cat (16.5%). The biggest spatial niche differentiation was between Red Fox and Yellow-throated Marten with habitat overlap rate of 7.7%. The daily rhythm of three species was used to indicate they temporal niche. We divided the day into 24 periods and period n was defined as the time interval between n and n + 1 oclock. We calculated the time-period relative abundance index (ITRA) of each period of each species to indicate the daily rhythm of three species. The result showed that the Red Fox and Leopard Cat showed similar daily rhythm, which were characterized by more active at night. The activity peaks of Red Fox occurred at 4:00﹣6:00, 20:00﹣21:00 and 23:00﹣24:00, while that of Leopard Cat occurred at 2:00﹣4:00, 6:00﹣7:00, 20:00﹣21:00 and 22:00﹣1:00 of the next day. On the contrary, Yellow-throated Marten tend to be active during the daytime and the activity peaks occurred at 9:00﹣10:00, 11:00﹣15:00 and 16:00﹣19:00 (Fig. 3). The results indicate that Red Fox, Yellow-throated Marten and Leopard Cat have adapted to different temporal or spatial niche from each other, and this makes it possible for them to coexist in the Wolong National Nature Reserve.

    参考文献
    Abrams P A. 1983. The Theory of Limiting Similarity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 14(1): 359–376. Berger K M, Gese E M. 2007. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76(6): 1075–1085. Broekhuis F, Cozzi G, Valeix M, et al. 2013. Risk avoidance in sympatric large carnivores: reactive or predictive? Journal of Animal Ecology, 82(5): 1098–1105. Chua M A H, Sivasothi N, Meier R. 2016. Population density, spatiotemporal use and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a human-modified succession forest landscape of Singapore. Mammal Research, 61(2): 99–108. Dellarte G L, Laaksonen T, Norrdahl K, et al. 2007. Variation in the diet composition of a generalist predator, the red fox, in relation to season and density of main prey. Acta Oecologica-international Journal of Ecology, 31(3): 276–281. Diazruiz F, Caro J, Delibesmateos M, et al. 2016. Drivers of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) daily activity: prey availability, human disturbance or habitat structure? Journal of Zoology, 298(2): 128–138. Grassman L I, Tewes M E, Silvy N J. 2005. Ranging, habitat use and activity patterns of binturong Arctictis binturong and yellow-throated marten Martes flavigula in north-central Thailand. Wildlife Biology, 11(1): 49–57. Grinnell J. 1917. The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher. The Auk, 34(4): 427–433. Hutchinson G E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22(3), 415–427. Liu X, Wu P, Songer M, et al. 2013. Monitoring wildlife abundance and diversity with infra-red camera traps in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve of Shaanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 33(33): 121–128. Reppert S M, Weaver D R. 2002. Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature, 418(6901): 935–941. 戈峰. 2008. 现代生态学. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 36–37. 黄蜂, 何流洋, 何可, 等. 2017. 拖乌山大熊猫廊道人类干扰的空间与时间分布格局——红外相机阵列调查. 动物学杂志, 52(3): 403–410. 蒋志刚. 2015. 中国哺乳动物多样性及地理分布. 北京: 科学出版社, 155–181. 李晟, 王大军, 肖治术, 等. 2014 红外相机技术在我国野生动物研究与保护中的应用前景. 生物多样性, 22(6): 865–695. 刘宇, 缪华, 蒋桂莲, 等. 2019. 云南古林箐省级自然保护区四种哺乳动物日活动节律及活动模式分析. 野生动物学报, 40(4): 832–839. 尚玉昌. 2006. 动物的行为节律. 生物学通报, 41(10): 8–10. 王庭林, 邹波, 刘青, 等. 2014. 山西省隰县鼬类食性的分析研究. 山西科技, 29(5): 47–49. 张洪茂, 胡锦矗. 2002. 川西北高原藏原羚夏季生境选择. 四川动物, 21(1): 12–15. 张源笙, 蒋健, 蒋万杰, 等. 2017. 北京松山国家级自然保护区兽类活动节律初步研究. 四川动物, 36(4): 460–467. 周海涛, 那晓东, 臧淑英, 等. 2016. 最大熵( Maxent) 模型在物种栖息地研究中的应用. 环境科学与管理, 41(3): 149–151. 周文扬, 魏万红. 1995. 赤狐的活动节律与产仔洞穴的选择. 兽类学报, 15(4): 267–272. 朱博伟, 王彬, 冉江洪, 等. 2019. 黄喉貂日活动节律及食性的季节变化. 兽类学报, 39(1): 52–61.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

胡强,林红强,戴强,杨志松,何流洋,张文,施小刚.2020.卧龙保护区三种中型食肉动物的生态位差异.动物学杂志,55(6):685-691.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1540
  • 下载次数: 1850
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-20
  • 最后修改日期:2020-10-26
  • 录用日期:2020-10-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-12-08