| 张靖之,张玲,胡娜金娃,戴依江,许家祥,苏渊龙,杨慧,李书宏,孙子晔,刘雪华.2023.利用红外相机监测大熊猫种群恢复区域生物多样性.动物学杂志,58(5):687-702. |
| 利用红外相机监测大熊猫种群恢复区域生物多样性 |
| Biodiversity Monitoring of a Giant Panda Population Recovery Region with Infrared Cameras |
| 投稿时间：2022-09-02 |
| DOI：10.13859/j.cjz.202305005 |
| 中文关键词: 秦岭 红外相机 非损伤监测 生物多样性 大熊猫 |
| 英文关键词:Qinling Mountains Infrared camera Non-invasive monitoring Biodiversity Giant Panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca |
| 基金项目:原国家林业局大熊猫国际合作专项(2017年项目)，秦岭大熊猫扩散的增长-消减区域的非损伤性监测研究； |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 49 |
| 全文下载次数: 535 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 红外相机是一种经典的野生动物观测手段，具有连续性、非损伤性等一系列优点，可以很好地应用于对大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)等重要野生动物物种的监测。2018年8月至2020年10月两年多时间，本研究在位于秦岭山系中段的陕西黄柏塬、观音山与佛坪三个国家级自然保护区中的4条沟谷(大南沟、破碾子沟、大古坪岩屋沟及龙潭子岩屋沟)共架设80台红外相机，对秦岭山系中段大熊猫种群恢复区域的野生动物活动情况进行非损伤性监测。监测期间共获得鸟类与兽类影像34 514张，辨认并记录68个物种，包括兽类21种和鸟类47种，在此基础上建立野生动物影像数据库，并利用该数据库分析了监测区域的物种多样性状况。结果显示，研究区域的生物多样性比较丰富，各物种丰度分布较为均匀，鸟类的多样性高于兽类，而均匀性较低；在不同沟谷中，佛坪保护区龙潭子岩屋沟的群落丰富性和均匀性均很高，但动物绝对数量较少，有待进一步调查；观音山保护区破碾子沟的群落丰富性和均匀性则最低，应关注这一区域的生态恢复工作；黄柏塬自然保护区大南沟监测到的野生动物总有效照片数与大熊猫有效照片数均最多，侧面说明其在4条沟谷中生态情况恢复相对较好；大古坪岩屋沟的兽类活动强度最低，也应予以一定关注。分别考虑山谷与山脊的监测结果，则山脊的物种丰富性与均匀性都优于山谷。本研究说明栖息地得到了较好恢复，丰富了秦岭山系中段地区基础生物数据库，可为未来对该地区的进一步科学研究与生态保护政策制订提供数据支撑。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objectives] Infrared camera is a classic wildlife observation method with many advantages, including continuity, non-invasiveness, etc. Therefore, it has been widely used in monitoring important wildlife species like Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Giant Panda acts as a flagship species and an umbrella species in Qinling. According to the fourth national survey on Giant Pandas, its population has picked up during 2003-2011 in the Qinling Mountains with the contribution of local ecological recovery. Qinling is not only a major habitat of Giant Panda nowadays, but also holds a Giant Panda population evolutionarily closer to the common ancestor of Giant Panda. Monitoring the Giant Panda population and biodiversity in its habitats is therefore essential for a better understanding towards its distribution, living patterns and protection. This research aims to investigate the wildlife diversity and activities during the Giant Panda population recovery period with prohibition of human activity, and use trapping images and diversity indexes to discuss similarities and differences between the wildlife distribution in the middle Qinling Mountains. [Methods] From August 2018 to October 2020, 80 infrared cameras were deployed among 4 valleys (Danangou Valley, Ponianzigou Valley, Dagupingyanwugou Valley and Longtanziyanwugou Valley) located in 3 nature reserves (Huangbaiyuan Nature Reserve, Guanyinshan Nature Reserve and Foping Nature Reserve) to monitor wildlife diversity and activities in the population recovery region of Giant Panda in the middle Qinling Mountains (Fig. 1 and 2, Table 1). All photos and videos were examined, and individual photos and individual richness of each species were counted. Species diversity on overall data (also for mammals and birds separately) and among different valleys was investigated using relative abundance index, rank abundance curve, Shannon-Wiener index and evenness index. Species similarity indices between valleys were calculated. All analyzing methods above were also used separately on data collected in valleys and on ridges. The rank abundance curves were tested by R-squared coefficients. [Results] A total of 34 514 bird and mammal images have been collected during the monitoring period, with a total effective working days of 54 240 d. 12 364 individual photos are identified and 10 612 of them can be confirmed into 68 species with 21 mammal species and 47 birds (Appendix 1). Based on this, a wildlife image database is established, with which the species diversity in the monitoring area is analyzed. Reeves’s Muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and Tufted Deer (Elaphodus cephalophus) are the three most abundant mammals, and Golden Pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus), Greater Necklaced Laughingthrush (Garrulax pectoralis) and White-throated Laughingthrush (Garrulax albogularis) are the three most abundant birds. The rank abundance curve of birds is flatter with a longer tail compared to mammals’ (Fig. 3). The Shannon-Wiener index of birds is higher than that of mammals, whilst the evenness index is lower (Table 2). Species are not evenly distributed among valleys. Danangou Valley in Huangbaiyuan Nature Reserve obtains the most individual photos (28.04%), while Longtanziyanwugou Valley in Foping Nature Reserve has the smallest proportion of individual photos (21.75%) (Fig. 4). Shannon-Wiener index and evenness index indicate an overall highest species diversity and evenness in Longtanziyanwugou Valley and the lowest diversity and evenness in Ponianzigou Valley in Guanyinshan Nature reserve, and a comparably high bird diversity and evenness in Dagupingyanwugou Valley in Foping Nature Reserve (Table 3). Species similarity indices of mammals among 4 valleys are significantly higher than those of birds. Ponianzigou Valley and Longtanziyanwugou Valley share the highest species similarity, while Ponianzigou Valley and Dagupingyanwugou Valley have the lowest species similarity (Table 4). Cameras placed on ridges identify more species and individual photos than those in valleys (Fig. 5). Higher Shannon-Wiener index and evenness index of all species and mammals are also found on the ridges, but the trends of birds are reversed, which might because of their preference of dense forests (Table 5). Species similarity indices between each ridge and valley indicate that species are more similar among different ridges than among different valleys, suggesting potential geographic isolation between valleys (Fig. 6). [Conclusion] In conclusion, this study enriches the basic biological database in middle Qinling Mountains, as well as provides data support for further scientific research and ecological protection policy. The biodiversity and species evenness are generally high in research areas. Birds are more diverse (with more species) than mammals but with less evenness and individual photos. Ponianzigou Valley has the lowest biodiversity and evenness among the 4 valleys in accordance with its shortest ecological recovery timespan, which calls for further attention. While Longtanziyanwugou Valley has the highest species diversity and evenness, although its individual photos are the least, which needs further investigation. Dagupingyanwugou Valley has a low mammal activity level, and more targeted protection measures are required. A total of 37 individual photos of Giant Panda were shot, with over 80% in Danangou Valley and none in Longtanziyanwugou Valley, reflecting substantial ecological recovery in Danangou Valley. |
| 附件 |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
